Comments for Clara Szalai Blog http://claraszalai.com/blog How could there be something from nothing? Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:33:13 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 Comment on Inception – an upgrade of Matrix? by bigberthalqsamigqs http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=72&cpage=1#comment-1894 bigberthalqsamigqs Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:33:13 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=72#comment-1894 I recently discovered your blog and still have already been reading through along. I've come across a few weird comments, nevertheless generally I've got to agree with what the additional commenters are writing. Because of so many greatgreat reviews with this weblog, I believed i should also start along with tell you that I truly loved looking over this your content. Therefore i feel this may make my 1st remark: "I feel you've created several genuinely fascinating things. Made folks would truly ponder over it the method that you merely do. I am just truly amazed that there are so much relating to this topic which were exposed so you made it happen consequently properly, with much course!inch I recently discovered your blog and still have already been reading through along. I’ve come across a few weird comments, nevertheless generally I’ve got to agree with what the additional commenters are writing. Because of so many greatgreat reviews with this weblog, I believed i should also start along with tell you that I truly loved looking over this your content. Therefore i feel this may make my 1st remark: “I feel you’ve created several genuinely fascinating things. Made folks would truly ponder over it the method that you merely do. I am just truly amazed that there are so much relating to this topic which were exposed so you made it happen consequently properly, with much course!inch

]]> Comment on Shit Floats by KH Tang http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=85&cpage=1#comment-1874 KH Tang Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:12:16 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=85#comment-1874 Interesting question. I think it does matter in some way... For the guy who has good intention and accidentally created bad result due to ignorance, he would learn the lesson and want to do it right the next time. For the guy who has bad intention and purposely created the desire result would celebrate and continue to do more of it. Then, I guess the next question would be... Who has the right to define what's good intention.... Endless loop again. :-) Bless You KH Tang Interesting question.
I think it does matter in some way…
For the guy who has good intention and accidentally created bad result due to ignorance, he would learn the lesson and want to do it right the next time.
For the guy who has bad intention and purposely created the desire result would celebrate and continue to do more of it.

Then, I guess the next question would be… Who has the right to define what’s good intention…. Endless loop again. :-)

Bless You
KH Tang

]]> Comment on Shit Floats by Clara http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=85&cpage=1#comment-1873 Clara Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:06:40 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=85#comment-1873 Wonderful story, KH. Does the intention matter? When you are dead, does it matter whether you were killed by good intention or bad faith? It brings to mind the proverb, "the road to hell is paved by good intentions." Wonderful story, KH. Does the intention matter? When you are dead, does it matter whether you were killed by good intention or bad faith? It brings to mind the proverb, “the road to hell is paved by good intentions.”

]]> Comment on Shit Floats by KH Tang http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=85&cpage=1#comment-1872 KH Tang Wed, 23 Feb 2011 02:34:24 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=85#comment-1872 This article reminds me of an old story told by Zhuangzi: 浑沌凿窍: 南海之帝为倏，北海之帝为忽，中央之帝为浑沌。倏与忽时相与遇于浑沌之地，浑沌待之甚善。倏与忽谋报浑沌之德，曰：“人皆有七窍以视听食息，此独无有，尝试凿之。”日凿一窍，七日而浑沌死。 Briefly translated Here: Once upon a time, there were three supernatural being… The one in the North named “Shu”, the one in the South named “Hu”, and the one on the middle named ”HunDun” (chaos). Shu and Hu met at HunDun’s place frequently, and they were treated very nicely by HunDun. One day, Shu and Hu were trying to repay the kindness of HunDun. They thought that: “Everyone has eyes to see, ears to hear, noise to smell, and mouth to eat, only our dear friend HunDun does not has any. Let’s help him by digging the holes on his head.” So, they digged one hole on HunDun Head everyday… Once they completed digging the seventh hole, HunDun Dead! The moral of the story is that – Everything has it uniqueness by nature, forcing to apply one’s “ideal” onto another may cause more harm than good. Well, in the above story, the intention of “Shu” and “Hu” were good, but they killed HunDun anyway. Now, in this current world, “democracy” been many times used as a Tool to stir up unrest for some other parts of the world, which can cause more harm than good… The only thing that is different from the Zhuangzi’s story is that… What’s the Intention? This blog entry – “Shit Floats” does point out the clues… and thinking is a very individual process anyway. :-) Bless You KH Tang This article reminds me of an old story told by Zhuangzi:
浑沌凿窍: 南海之帝为倏，北海之帝为忽，中央之帝为浑沌。倏与忽时相与遇于浑沌之地，浑沌待之甚善。倏与忽谋报浑沌之德，曰：“人皆有七窍以视听食息，此独无有，尝试凿之。”日凿一窍，七日而浑沌死。

Briefly translated Here:
Once upon a time, there were three supernatural being… The one in the North named “Shu”, the one in the South named “Hu”, and the one on the middle named ”HunDun” (chaos). Shu and Hu met at HunDun’s place frequently, and they were treated very nicely by HunDun.

One day, Shu and Hu were trying to repay the kindness of HunDun. They thought that: “Everyone has eyes to see, ears to hear, noise to smell, and mouth to eat, only our dear friend HunDun does not has any. Let’s help him by digging the holes on his head.” So, they digged one hole on HunDun Head everyday… Once they completed digging the seventh hole, HunDun Dead!

The moral of the story is that – Everything has it uniqueness by nature, forcing to apply one’s “ideal” onto another may cause more harm than good.

Well, in the above story, the intention of “Shu” and “Hu” were good, but they killed HunDun anyway. Now, in this current world, “democracy” been many times used as a Tool to stir up unrest for some other parts of the world, which can cause more harm than good…

The only thing that is different from the Zhuangzi’s story is that…
What’s the Intention? This blog entry – “Shit Floats” does point out the clues… and thinking is a very individual process anyway. :-)

Bless You
KH Tang

]]> Comment on Inception – an upgrade of Matrix? by Paving Slabs %0B http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=72&cpage=1#comment-1845 Paving Slabs %0B Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:25:18 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=72#comment-1845 ";. I am really thankful to this topic because it really gives useful information ":: “;. I am really thankful to this topic because it really gives useful information “::

]]> Comment on The Ontological Proof of the Existence of God? by weS the mess http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=80&cpage=1#comment-1804 weS the mess Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:56:36 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1804 I am in FULL agreement with the text - “If what you said was proof, then anything, but anything could be ‘proven.’ And then, ‘proof’ would be meaningless.” from the above non-rhetoric, - , and I would hope that the most perfect being that does not exist, would not ever contemplate the above mind swallow, for if they did, they would surely not be most perfect, which might negate the already negated, which would prove that no being exists as we have been taught to believe. Although this non-existence sure is a kick in the butt! ! Wa-HOOOO! I am in FULL agreement with the text -
“If what you said was proof, then anything, but anything could be ‘proven.’ And then, ‘proof’ would be meaningless.”

from the above non-rhetoric, – , and I would hope that the most perfect being that does not exist, would not ever contemplate the above mind swallow, for if they did, they would surely not be most perfect, which might negate the already negated, which would prove that no being exists as we have been taught to believe. Although this non-existence sure is a kick in the butt! ! Wa-HOOOO!

]]> Comment on Inception – an upgrade of Matrix? by Jennifer http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=72&cpage=1#comment-1802 Jennifer Sun, 09 Jan 2011 16:27:07 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=72#comment-1802 I conceive other website proprietors should take this site as an model, very clean and fantastic user genial design . I conceive other website proprietors should take this site as an model, very clean and fantastic user genial design .

]]> Comment on The Ontological Proof of the Existence of God? by Jimmy Ryan http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=80&cpage=1#comment-1795 Jimmy Ryan Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:19:13 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1795 I dont perceive (god) as a Perfect being at all... basic universal truths... we are all sparks of the divine and infinate mind. we are all of the one, by the one, and return to the one...The universe looks at its self through the eyes of man.As we awake from our slumber....and begin to remember these truths, we already know...we begin to harmonize with all of exsitance, and dance in perfect balance with gravity and without... I dont perceive (god) as a Perfect being at all… basic universal truths… we are all sparks of the divine and infinate mind. we are all of the one, by the one, and return to the one…The universe looks at its self through the eyes of man.As we awake from our slumber….and begin to remember these truths, we already know…we begin to harmonize with all of exsitance, and dance in perfect balance with gravity and without…

]]> Comment on The Ontological Proof of the Existence of God? by Prof. Samuel http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=80&cpage=1#comment-1794 Prof. Samuel Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:07:39 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1794 With all due respect, Prof Friedman arguments misses the mark! The minute anybody uses the words ontological or teleological , you know they speaking poppycock! If the most perfect being would be truly perfect he or she would choose not to exist as not to embarrass the more perfect being that might exist. With all due respect, Prof Friedman arguments misses the mark! The minute anybody uses the words ontological or teleological , you know they speaking poppycock! If the most perfect being would be truly perfect he or she would choose not to exist as not to embarrass the more perfect being that might exist.

]]> Comment on The Ontological Proof of the Existence of God? by Prof. H.Friedmann http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=80&cpage=1#comment-1793 Prof. H.Friedmann Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:48:31 +0000 http://claraszalai.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1793 The most perfect being must necessarily exist. For suppose that A has all the perfections but does not exist. Then A could not be the most perfect being because B, who has all the perfections, like A, but, in addition exists would be more perfect than A. This shows that to say that the most perfect being does not exist is like saying that the most perfect being is not the most perfect being. The most perfect being must necessarily exist. For suppose that A has all the perfections but does not exist. Then A could not be the most perfect being because B, who has all the perfections, like A, but, in addition exists would be more perfect than A. This shows that to say that the most perfect being does not exist is like saying that the most perfect being is not the most perfect being.

]]>